EVERYTHING IS FLUORIDE, FLUORIDE, FLUORIDE, BUT DO YOU SEE THE
QUEUES AT THE DENTISTS GETTING ANY SHORTER OVER THE YEARS? DIDN'T
THINK SO, IF YOUR LIKE ME, YOU HAVE SEEM THEM GROW
LONGER!!!!!!!!!!
FLUORIDE
(*) denotes
comments from webmaster.
Geelong now has
neurotoxic waste in its drinking
water (*Like it or not
and 'forget Human rights attitude' from
Government)
Hexafluorosilicic Acidis a registered
Class 2 Poisonunder the Poisons Act
1972. It is comparable to the deadly weed killer
Paraquat which has no known antidote and has now been
banned from sale to gardeners. It is not
certificated as a medicine. How could it be? The
current level of one mg per litre of fresh water is around ten
times the concentration of natural and harmless Calcium
fluoride, often found in natural water sources. Our Labour
Government has legalized fluoride, while the Department of
Health is promoting it. WHY?
(*i wonder what a magistrate
would say about having some of this put in his water
bottles because someone else say's so?)
Victoria's Chief Health Officer, Dr
Rosemary Lester, announced the June 22 start
date.
Barwon Water, which will be required to
carry out the fluoride dosing, has
built new facilities at the Wurdee Boluc and
Moorabool water treatment plants, to the west and north of
Geelong.*( hard to believe that
water bills have gone up so much lately? now we know why, not
that we where ever asked or told....)
*"Barwon Water is a company and
a company by law must make a profit (check the ASIC rules).
Therefore Directors and shareholders wont money, means a
service that should owned by the people to provide for
the people is being taken advantage of and
misrepresented" you may ask yourself, do the other government
departments no of this? the answer is yes, does the council of
geelong know this? the answer is yes. all the other answers
you can think of have a yes answer also...... are they acting
on your best behalf and giving you value for the money you
spend on them? the only answer i could answer with a "NO" Does
any more need to be said? i don't even want an answer for that
as we all no there is only one answer..........
It was these 'Dosing Plants' that proved to be the
'Achilles Heel' of the 'Last Attempt to Fluoridate' Geelong's
water. *(not to mention the Blatant
Disrespect for the Peoples Wishes and opposition and to
think, that they actually draw a wages to do
this.)
Union bans on the plants stopped the release of
fluoride just days before its introduction in 1986. *(This also happened in two other country
Victoria towns but there, the schedule 7 poison pumping
machines were dismantled.)
attempts to introduce it in some parts of regional Victoria
have met widespread resistance
*The title should be 'People of
Geelong Pay more to get their Water Poisoned'
GEELONG'S freshly(*There is nothing fresh about
it) fluoridated water will cost consumers 14 per cent more from next
month
The Essential Services
Commission has approved water - which will be
fluoridated from next week - and sewage price rises for Barwon
Water customers of 13.8 per cent, including CPI of 2.47 per
cent, from July 1
(*Guess the CPI was ok till the
fluoride factor came along?)
Mr Lowrey
also said the higher prices would encourage water
conservation
(oh, so CPI not the problem
then?)
"It sends a clear message (*muddy
as) to customers that the less they use, the less they
pay," he said.
*A statement usually made by someone
that would be the owner of something (*Water's a natural resource)
Meanwhile, Department of Human Services spokesman 'Bram Alexander' yesterday said
commissioning work was on schedule for the Fluoride Dosing
Facilities at the Wurdee Boluc and Moorabool water treatment
plants.
Mr Alexander said the
move was a part of the Victorian Government policy of
expanding fluoride to cover the entire state. (*Not what the rest of the people in the state
had in mind though)
The Barwon Association for Freedom from Fluoridation has
kept up a stiff opposition to the introduction of the scheme,
saying fluoride was "poisoning" the community. (*there has been no opposition only oppression
and no referendum cause they know the people would not
allow themselves to be poisoned by anyone.)
A rally of more than 200 people marched the streets of
Geelong on Saturday and the group has vowed to continue the
fight in the Supreme Court, use picket lines or vote MPs out
of office. (*People of Geelong You need to
stand together on this issue and have it stopped, whatever the
cost.
*Perhaps 350,000 water meters on the
front steps of Barwon water might make them look on the way
into the Building the water rate payers paid for and make them
wonder where their wages are going to come from if they don't
listen to the people responsible for them....
"Mr Alexander"scoffed at the group's claims, saying the
weight of scientific evidence showed that "optimal levels" of
fluoride in water fluoridation programs did not cause allergic
reactions or allergy-like symptoms. (*the
original argument is 'forcing mass medication on
people' and insulting their intelligence when it comes to
what they want to ingest thus denying them their Human
Rights)
I invite Mr ALEXANDER to Challenge the evidence I have on
this page and tons more information I have personally gathered
over the last 6 years, I assure everyone out there he will
decline like kevin rudd has Joe Ludwig,Barwon Water and Dept
Human Resources and many others that have let the Geelong
society down.
They scoff yet did anyone in Geelong ask for Fluoride? did
anyone get any comprehensive paperwork on fluoride sent
to their homes like they did with all the Fluoride Propaganda
telling us nothing but the fact that we are going to
have Fluoride (and not the original calcium fluoride but
hydrofluorisic fluoride,schedule 7 poison, ratsak)
and also what goes on in the actual fluoride
processes that are just as harmful when it's into put in
our water? the answer is No.
FLUORIDE IS A WASTE BY
PRODUCT FROM THE ALUMINUM AND FERTIZLER
INDUSTRIES.
HOW CAN ANYTHING THAT IS
SCRAPED OF THE WALLS OF SMOKE STACKS BE GOOD FOR HUMANS? HOW
TOXIC AND CRIMINAL CHARGES SHOULD BE LAID IN ANY COUNTRY
FORCING MASS MEDICATION LEADING TO PERSONAL HEALTH ISSUSES AND
EVEN POSSIBLE LOSS OF LIFE.
FLUORIDE AND TOOTH
DECAY
Tooth decay has indeed decreased around the world.
However, fluoride is not the
cause. Tooth decay has declined as much or more in non-fluoridated areas as in
those with fluoridation. This
has been reported in Germany, British Columbia, New Zealand, Cuba,
Finland, and the United States. Some small
studies show slight benefits of fluoridation. One
American study of 39,207 children showed reduced decay of
deciduous teeth in 5-year olds in fluoridated areas compared
with unfluoridated areas, but no reduction in decay in
permanent teeth. The larger studies
worldwide show little or no dental benefits of water
fluoridation .
The Journal Fluoride,
Vol. 27, #1, 13-22, 1994 reported that in a study of 98% of
the children in New Zealand over 14 years, fluoridation had no
dental benefit on these children.
In fact, non-fluoridated
communities had slightly less
decay. Tooth decay
correlated with the level of income and
nutrition, not
fluoridation.
A study of over 400,000
children in India also showed no benefit of water
fluoridation. Studies in England and Scotland found the same
result. Dr. Albert
Schatz, discoverer of
streptomycin, found the same thing in Chile in a study
spanning 40 years. A recent
study in Tucson, Arizona by Dr.
Cornelius Steelink, University of
Arizona, showed an increase
in decayed, missing or filled teeth with increased fluoride
in the drinking
water.
As a result of these
and other studies, almost all major
nations except the US and Britain have stopped fluoridating. 98% of
Europe has stopped it. Ireland, one of the few European nations still doing it, is considering discontinuing it.
Canada has advised against giving it to
children less than 6 years old. India, China and Japan studied it
thoroughly and discontinued it.
FLOURIDE SAFETY
Fluorine is a highly toxic
element. Proponents say it is a nutrient.
Scientists are mixed on this point. If it is a necessary
nutrient, only a trace amount is needed in
the body. We get this from
foods such as tea, and small
amounts are found naturally
in most drinking water. (*also
found in peas and rice and more)
Sodium fluoride and Hydrofluosilicic
acid, the chemicals used in water
fluoridation, are cumulative toxins.
It is sold as ratpoison, used in pesticides, and
is the active ingredient in Saran
nerve gas. Fluoride
tablets require a prescription, unlike any other nutrient
mineral. All fluoride
toothpaste comes with a warning label. The label states
"Keep out of the reach of children
under 6". "If you swallow more than used for brushing,
seek professional assistance or contact a
poison control center
immediately." This warning applies to anything greater than
a pea-sized drop of
toothpaste on your brush.
Fluoride is considered one of the worst, if not the worst airborne pollutant, responsible for
decimating fish
and wildlife populations. (*and they want us to drink this
poison) The United
States is one of 22 nations that signed a treaty promising not to dump fluorides
into the oceans, lakes or
rivers .
In the doses that fluoridated
water provides, fluoride is associated with higher rates of birth defects, cancer and immunosuppression, lower IQ of children, dental and skeletal
fluorosis, and neurological problems. It has also been shown to cause
increased bone fractures, cataracts and infant
mortality, and some 20 other
health effects. A study in Brain Research, vol. 784:1998 showed
that fluoride in the water fed to
rats increased the absorption of
aluminum into the rats brains, causing alterations in the
brains similar to Alzheimer's
Disease. Also, fluoride is highly corrosive.
Several studies in Massachusetts and elsewhere found higher levels of
lead in the
drinking water in fluoridated
areas. This is most likely due to corrosion of lead
pipe joints as a result of the corrosive chemical .
A new study also showed
that fluoride
accumulates in the pineal gland. This
is a hormonal control center
and causes severe imbalances in
some sensitive people. The work, titled Fluoride Deposition
In The Aged
Pineal Gland was done as a PhD
thesis by Jennifer Luke and published in Caries
Research. It can also be found at www.fluoridealert.org
The fluoride itself isn't the only
problem. The
chemical used to fluoridate
is not pure. Hydrofluosilicic acid and sodium
fluoride are industrial wastes, by-products of the phosphate
fertilizer industry. This was challenged by the fluoride promoters
in Ohio, but later they were forced to admitthis is the
truth. They contain traces of lead, arsenic, mercury, kerosene, napha, and
other pollutants from the smokestack scrubbers of phosphate
factories. They also contain radioactive elements
.
WE ALREADY
INGEST TOO MUCH FLUORIDE
Fluoride is now in the food
chain, thanks to 50 years of water fluoridation, fluoride in
pesticides, and airborne pollution. As a result, people
are already getting more than the recommended 1 mg per day
just from foods and beverages. Fruit juices, baby foods,
and other select items are particularly high, due to
processing and pesticide residues.
As a result, we don't need
more fluoride. Dental fluorosis, or fluoride toxicity,
is a growing problem. An article in the British Medical
Journal, Aug. 26, 2000;189:216-220 reported that 54% of the
children living in fluoridated areas have signs of
fluorosis.
Several nations, including
Germany, stopped fluoridating because they realized it is immoral to
massmedicate the
entire population, especially when fluoride tablets, drops,
toothpaste and other preparations are inexpensive and readily
available .
In 1992,
the Safe Water Foundation filed suit against the city of Fond
DuLac, Wisconsin (Wisconsin Appellate Case
#93-2275). They showed that fluoridation is mass medication of the
population with a controlled
substance, without the
knowledge or consent of the
participants. Even for mental
patients, consent is required for
medical treatment. Additionally, the dosage is not regulated, because some people drink more
water than others.
Wealthy people can afford bottled water or
expensive reverse osmosis filters to take it out. The
poor are forced to drink the medicated water. The poor
suffer the most from the toxic effects of
fluoride.
(*I personaaly think that any one that suggests
fluoridating water knowing this information should be held on
criminal charges "intent to harm others" and terrorism against
mankind.)
LEADING
EXPERTS CHANGE THEIR MINDS
( And now for the juicey part your've been waiting
for)
Dr. Hardy Limeback, DDS, PhD, is head of
the Department of Preventive Dentistry at the
University of Toronto, and president of the Canadian Association for
Dental Research. He is
Canada's leading fluoride authority, and until recently
the nation's primary fluoride promoter. Two years ago he changed his
mind.He publically apologized for 15 years of misleading the
people of Canada on the issue of
fluoridation. Dr. Limeback said thatToronto,
fluoridated for 36 years and has a higher incidence
of cavities than Vancouver, which
has never fluoridated its water. He said the Centers for
Disease Control are basing their fluoride
recommendation on 50-year-old studies that don't
reflect new research .
Dr John Colquhoun was
the Principal Dental Officer for Auckland, the largest city in
New
Zealand, and a staunch fluoridation advocate -
until he was given the task of reviewing
the world-wide data on fluoride effectiveness and
safety. His review is
titled
"Why I Changed My Mind About
Fluoridation". In it, he
details how data was manipulated to support fluoridation in the English-speaking countries
.
Dr. Phyllis Mullinex
was commissioned by the US Army, MEDCOM to research
possible neurological effects of fluoridating the water supply
at Fort Detrick, Maryland. She worked at Harvard University Dental School. She expected a routine
investigation. However, her results shocked even herself when she found that
rats fed fluoride developed a variety of
neurological defects. She was forced to advise the army
not to fluoridate - and lost her job as a
result .
Perhaps the most incredible turnaround is
by the Environmental Protection Agency's
Union of Scientists and
Engineers. In May 1999, they announcedthey oppose their own agency's stand on
waterfluoridation.
Senior vice-president of the union, Dr. William Hurzy wrote,
"recent, peer-reviewed toxicity data, when applied to EPA's standard
method for controlling risks from toxic chemicals, require an
immediate halt to the use of the nation's drinking water
reservoirs as disposal sites for the toxic waste of the
phosphate fertilizer industry". (
need we need to know any more at this point? sickening
ey?)
(*Dentist is a surgeon of teeth when
you have to
see him it's already to
late.)
I debated the head of the dental society when Phoenix
considered fluoridation in 1990, and participated recently in
the debate in Wooster, Ohio. The dentists and public
health officials did not independently review the recent
research. Instead, they continued the refrain that
everyone knows fluoride is safe, reduces tooth decay 35-60%,
and is worth imposing on everyone as a public health
measure.
When challenged, they resorted to character assassination of anyone who
does not agree with them. Their
basic argument is - trust us and stop asking
questions!
WHAT CAUSES
TOOTH DECAY?
Dental hygiene and dental care are certainly important
factors. A recent review of tooth decay in the Journal
of the American Dental Association, July 2000 suggests that
fluoride plays a role, but works topically. However, the
decline in tooth decay rates worldwide, regardless of
fluoridation and before fluoride toothpaste came into
widespread use, calls this into question.
Many studies show that poor
nutrition, especially consumption of mineral-deficient foods
and sugars, negatively affect the teeth. Although
largely composed of calcium and phosphorus, many minerals are
needed for the teeth. These include zinc, copper,
manganese, boron, vanadium and others. Vitamin C helps
build the collagen matrix that bones grow within.
Vitamin D is very important, and others like vitamin A may
also play a role. Refined foods are deficient in
minerals and vitamins.
Weston Price, DDS did extensive research on
tooth decay around the world. His book, Nutrition and
Physical Degeneration, is a classic on dental disease and
nutrition. He found that wherever refined, canned and
other processed food replaced traditional diets, tooth decay
became a major problem. Although some people are more
disposed to dental problems that others, it is not a genetic
difference. Dr. Price was able to show that in one or
two generations the teeth among many groups deteriorated from
the use of refined food diets.
CONCLUSION
Except for trusting some
dentists and public health officials who may be
well-intentioned, but lie and attempt to demolish the
character of their opponents, I can find no reason to
recommend water fluoridation. You can read the material
for yourself and make up your own mind. Your
health may depend on it. Wooster, Ohio voted down
fluoridation in the 2000 elections. Flagstaff, Arizona
also rejected fluoridation in 2001 .
COPY OF LETTER SENT TO HUMAN RESOURCES
MINISTER (Senator Joe Ludwig) ON JUNE 17TH, 2008
(*I tried ringing the hot line # : 1800
651 723 late at night but got no answer. I would say our
opinion only counts between 9am and 5pm( not even an answering
machine) and even then i wouldn't hold my breath.)
*I was wondering if you could
tell me how the waste of the fertilizer and aluminium
industries that our bodies were not born with a deficiency of
could be good for the human race? because I can not fathom how
anything scraped of the walls of the smoke stacks in alcoa and
then put into our water (when Germany has banned it including
in its toothpaste)supplies can not be harmful to us.
Especially when the human body gets natural fluoride from so
many things already, if you would like to take the time to
educate yourself on fluoride I have a section on my website
that will be updated
drastically over the next few weeks the URL is : http://www.marioserra.net/marioserra.net-Fluoride.htm
I have had communications with
barwon water here in Geelong and they passed the buck straight
onto you, I also have research videos and plenty of
documentation to support what I found out many years ago that
you should be aware of, I was going to leave a postal address
but I don't like people hiding behind letters and big
envelopes I like to speak face to face and tell you what your
really thinking, lets call it a gift for now. regards mario
serra concerned Australian resident.
If I get no reply and the
government wins in its efforts to mass medicate, barwon water
has been told they can come and take their water meter away
and I can assure you from the number of people that have
Emailed my website and have said the same thing is quite
concerning, I'm sure you are probably not aware (or don't
care) how strongly people feel about it.
now lets see what sort of reply if any I get. I will keep
you all posted
update post : 9th july still nothing, but yet he is drawing
tax money as wages.
31st of August still no reply as you can see the
govt. has no concern when it comes to real issuses that they
create.
I am not holding my breath for a
reply as i'm sure you will agree that once he sees all the
info available on fluoride he will realize that he is an
accessory before during and after the fact and like the rest
of us no one is in a hurry to run to the courtroom to say i'm
guilty.
Fluoridation - Hard To
Swallow
Anti fluoridation march
in Geelong
Feel Free To Contact the
Minister
( *we are resposible
for his wages so why not? just don't hold your breath for
a reply).
Senator Joe Ludwig
Parliament House
Suite MG64Parliament House Canberra ACT 2600
( *couldn't have him sit in a
plain office and waste our money and allow deaths,might
make us look like cheapskates in our demise ).
Phone: (02) 6277 7200 Fax: (02) 6273 4406
I hope it's not his department
that keeps on attempting to trash this webpage???? haha keep
trying
Once you have seen all the infomation
on this page and others you go to, to see the plethora of data
on fluoride you can consider the fact that you may know more
than the minister because if he knew all this then (and he
should to hold the postion like he does) would we all
have this problem of their lack of education costing us so
much and trying to poison us in the procedure?
The answer is one of two possiblities 1
: he knows all this and doesn't care and is in on the
con.
or
2 : He has no idea about fluoridation
and its effects on people and doesn't care to want to
know.
EITHER ANSWER YOU PICK ... TRY
IT IN YOUR WORKPLACE SEE HOW LONG YOU LAST.
<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<birds of a feather flock together>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Recently sent email to the Prime
Minister
I recently sent of a email to the PM about the little
problem on mass medication / fluoridation we all have and have
just got back a reply,as per usual another passing of
buck, he was that interested that he got someone else to
answer the letter I sent in, just like Barwon Water has
done and Joe Ludwig and all the other departments they have
sent me to.
all incompetent wage takers..... as you will see in the
reply I got back from the department it was thrown to. read
reply for yourself.
official govt logo
AUSTRALIAN GOVERNMENT
Department
of Health and Ageing
Dear Mr
Serra,
Thankyou for your email of 31 August 2008 to the Prime
Minister, Hon Kevin Rudd MP, concerning the fluoridation of
drinking water. This matter falls within the portfolio
responsibility of Minister for Health and Ageing. the Hon
Nicola Roxon MP. The Minister has asked me to reply on her
behalf.
I note your concerns that water fluoridation may be harmful
to people with chronic kidney disease (CKD).
The most up to date evidence confirms fluoride has been
endorsed by the World Health Organisation, Australian Medical
Association and American Academy of Pediatrics,and poses no
known health risks.
The national health position on fluoridation of water
supplies is set out on Healthy
Months Healthy lives : Australia's National Oral Health
Plan2004-2013 (
the Plan ), which has been endorsed by
the Australian Health Ministers' Conference. The Plan notes
that fluoridation of public water supplies is the
single most effective public health measure for reducing
dental caries across the population, the plan recommends
extending fluoridation of public water supplies to communities
across Australia with populations of 1000 more.
The latest National Health and Medical Reasearch Council
(NHMRC ) systematic review of fluoride and health, The Efficacy and Safety ofFluoridation
2007, states that fluoridation of
drinking water remains the most effective measure of reducing
dental caries. The document notes that there is very little
evidence of harmful effects of water fluoridation. A
brief summary of the report can be found in the NHMRC
statement at
The Commonwealth Department of Health and Ageing is
not aware of scientific evidence that links the
fluoridation of community drinking water in
Australia with adverse health effects. You may find
:The Risks of Consumption of
Fluoridated Water for people with Chronic Kidney
Disease: aPosition Statement by Kidney
Health Australia helpful. The paper notes that although more
research into linkages between fluoride consumption and
harmful health effects is required, there is no conclusive
evidence that the consumption of fluoridated community water
poses any risks for people with CKD. However, people with
stage four or five may wish to discuss their intake of
fluoride-rich substances with their renal specialist. The
position paper is included in this correspondence and it is
also available at:
As
the State and Territory Governments manage
water fluoridation schemes you may wish to raise your
concerns directly with the Department of Human Services on
1800 651 723 or wtite to :
Department of Human Services
50 Lonsdale Street
Melbourne Vic
3000
The Victorian Government has information available for the
public at the following website:
*To the email I sent the PM, but I
so was unimpressed with the answer as I'm sure all the
readers are also, that I threw the letter so far away from me
that it took me weeks to find the courage to post it..... as
you can see the amount of ignorance that is in the reply
is amazing....cheers for now.
*our good hard earned money goes
towards paying for uneducated people.......
Fluoride used by Nazis to sterilize
inmates and make them docile. Fluoride a key dumbing down
ingredient of Prozac and Sarin nerve gas -- poisons of choice
for tyrant rats.
First of all, it needs to be stated that the
'substance' referred to as 'Fluoride' is a misnomer - there is
no such substance listed in the periodic chart of the
elements, nor in the prestigious CRC handbook, nor in the
sacred 'bible' of the pharmaceutical industry - the
illustrious 'Merck Index'. Instead, we find a GAS called
Fluorine - and from the use of this gas in various industries
such as aluminum manufacturing and the nuclear industry
-certain toxic byproducts are created which have 'captured'
fluorine molecules. One such toxic, poisonous 'byproduct' is
called sodium Fluoride - which according to the Merck Index is
primarily used as rat and cockroach poison and is also the
active ingredient in most toothpastes and as an "additive to
drinking water". But sadly, there is much more to this sordid
tale.
Did you know that sodium Fluoride is also one
of the basic ingredients in both PROZAC (FLUoxetene
Hydrochloride) and Sarin Nerve Gas
(Isopropyl-Methyl-Phosphoryl FLUORIDE) - (Yes, folks the same
Sarin Nerve Gas that terrorists released on a crowded Japanese
subway train!). Let me repeat: the truth the American public
needs to understand is the fact that Sodium Fluoride is
nothing more (or less) than a hazardous waste by-product of
the nuclear and aluminum industries. In addition to being the
primary ingredient in rat and cockroach poisons, it is also a
main ingredient in anesthetic, hypnotic, and psychiatric drugs
as well as military NERVE GAS! Why, oh why then is it allowed
to be added to the toothpastes and drinking water of the
American people?
Historically, this substance was quite
expensive for the worlds' premier chemical companies to
dispose of - but in the 50's and 60's - Alcoa and the entire
aluminum industry - with a vast overabundance of the toxic
waste - SOMEHOW sold the FDA and our government on the insane
(but highly profitable) idea of buying this poison at a
20,000% markup and then injecting it into our water supply as
well as into the nation's toothpastes and dental rinse. Yes
that's right folks, a 20,000% markup. Consider also that when
sodium Fluoride is injected into our drinking water, its level
is approximately 1 part-per-million (ppm), but since we only
drink ½ of one percent of the total water supply, the
hazardous chemical literally 'goes down the drain' and voila -
the chemical industry has not only a free hazardous waste
disposal system - but we have also PAID them handsomely in the
process!!
Independent scientific evidence over the past
50 plus years has shown that sodium fluoride shortens our life
span, promotes various cancers and mental disturbances, and
most importantly, makes humans stupid, docile, and
subservient, all in one neat little package. There is
increasing evidence that aluminum in the brain is a causative
factor in Alzheimer's Disease, and evidence points towards
sodium fluoride's strong affinity to 'bond' with this
dangerous aluminum (remember it is a byproduct of aluminum
manufacturing) and also it has the ability to 'trick' the
blood-brain barrier by imitating the hydrogen ion thus
allowing this chemical access to brain tissue.
Honest scientists who have attempted to blow
the whistle on sodium fluoride's mega-bucks propaganda
campaign have consistently been given a large dose of
professional 'black-listing' and thus their valid points
disputing the current vested interests never have received the
ink they deserve in the national press. Just follow the money
to find the 'control' and you will find prominent American
families to be prominent 'players' in the scandal. In 1952 a
slick PR campaign rammed the concept of 'fluoridation' through
our Public Health departments and various dental
organizations. This slick campaign was more akin to a highly
emotional "beer salesman convention" instead of the objective,
scientifically researched program that it should have been. It
has continued in the same vein right up to the present day -
and now sodium fluoride use has now become 'usual and
customary'.
To illustrate the emotional vs. the scientific
nature of this issue, just look at the response given by
people (perhaps yourself included?) when the subject of
fluoridation comes up. You need to ask yourself, "Is this
particular response based on EMOTIONS born of TRADITION, or is
it truly unbiased and based instead on thoroughly researched
objectivity?" There is a tremendous amount of emotional,
highly unscientific "know-it-all" emotions attached to the
topic of 'sodium fluoride' usage -but I personally have yet to
find even ONE objective, double blind study that even remotely
links sodium fluoride to healthy teeth at ANY AGE. Instead, I
hear and read such blather as "9 out of 10 DENTISTS recommend
'fluoride' toothpaste" etc. etc. etc. Let me reiterate: truly
independent (unattached to moneyed vested interest groups)
scientists who've spent a large portion of their lives
studying and working with this subject have been hit with a
surprising amount of unfair character assassinations from
strong vested-interest groups who reap grand profits from the
public's ignorance as well as from their illnesses. (Just
follow the money!)
Do you have diabetes and/or kidney disease?
There are reportedly more than 11 million Americans with
diabetes. If it is true that diabetics drink more liquids than
other people, then according to the Physicians Desk Reference
these 11 million people are at much higher risk drinking
fluoridated water because they will receive a much deadlier
dose because of their need for higher than normal water
consumption. Kidney disease, by definition, lowers the
efficiency of the kidneys, which of course is the primary
means in which fluoride (or any other toxic chemical) is
eliminated from the body. Does it not make sense that these
people shouldn't drink fluoridated water at all? Cases are on
record (Annapolis, Maryland, 1979) where ill kidney patients
on dialysis machines died because they ingested relatively
small amounts of SODIUM FLUORIDE from unwittingly drinking the
'fluoridated' city water supply? Will adequate warnings be
given to people with weak kidneys, or will the real cause of
such deaths be 'covered up' in the name of 'domestic
tranquility'?
Concerning the 'practice' of putting sodium
fluoride into drinking water, where did this insanity begin
and WHO tried it first? From personal research, the very first
occurrence of purposefully putting sodium fluoride into
drinking water was in the German ghettos and in Nazi Germany's
infamous prison camps. The Gestapo you see had little concern
about sodium fluoride's 'supposed' effect on children's teeth;
instead, their reason for mass-medicating water with sodium
fluoride was to STERILIZE HUMANS and force the people in their
concentration camps into calm, bovine, submission. (See for
reference: "The Crime and Punishment of I.G. Farben" written
by Joseph Borkin.) Kind of shocking isn't it folks!! Ah, but
it gets even better.
The following letter was received by the Lee
Foundation for Nutritional Research, Milwaukee Wisconsin, on 2
October 1954, from a research chemist by the name of Charles
Perkins. He writes:
"I have your letter of September 29 asking for
further documentation regarding a statement made in my book,
"The Truth about Water Fluoridation", to the effect that the
idea of water fluoridation was brought to England from Russia
by the Russian Communist Kreminoff. In the 1930's Hitler and
the German Nazis envisioned a world to be dominated and
controlled by a Nazi philosophy of pan-Germanism. The German
chemists worked out a very ingenious and far-reaching plan of
mass-control which was submitted to and adopted by the German
General Staff. This plan was to control the population in any
given area through mass medication of drinking water supplies.
By this method they could control the population in whole
areas, reduce population by water medication that would
produce sterility in women, and so on. In this scheme of
mass-control, sodium fluoride occupied a prominent
place.
"Repeated doses of infinitesimal amounts of
fluoride will in time reduce an individual's power to resist
domination, by slowly poisoning and narcotizing a certain area
of the brain, thus making him submissive to the will of those
who wish to govern him. [A convenient and cost-effective light
lobotomy? --- Ott].
"The real reason behind water fluoridation is
not to benefit children's teeth. If this were the real reason
there are many ways in which it could be done that are much
easier, cheaper, and far more effective. The real purpose
behind water fluoridation is to reduce the resistance of the
masses to domination and control and loss of
liberty."
"When the Nazis under Hitler decided to go to
Poland, both the German General Staff and the Russian General
Staff exchanged scientific and military ideas, plans, and
personnel, and the scheme of mass control through water
medication was seized upon by the Russian Communists because
it fitted ideally into their plans to communize the
world."
"I was told of this entire scheme by a German
chemist who was an official of the great I.G. Farben chemical
industries and was also prominent in the Nazi movement at the
time. I say this with all the earnestness and sincerity of a
scientist who has spent nearly 20 years' research into the
chemistry, biochemistry, physiology and pathology of fluorine
--- any person who drinks artificially fluorinated water for a
period of one year or more will never again be the same person
mentally or physically."
Signed: CHARLES E. PERKINS, Chemist, 2
October, 1954.
Another letter needs to be quoted at length as
well to help corroborate Mr. Perkin's testimony. This letter
was written by a brilliant (and objectively honest) scientist
named Dr. E.H. Bronner. Dr. Bronner was a nephew of the great
Albert Einstein, served time in a WWII prison camp and wrote
the following letter printed in the Catholic Mirror,
Springfield, MA, January 1952:
"It appears that the citizens of Massachusetts
are among the 'next' on the agenda of the water
poisoners.
"There is a sinister network of subversive
agents, Godless intellectual parasites, working in our country
today whose ramifications grow more extensive, more successful
and more alarming each new year and whose true objective is to
demoralize, paralyze and destroy our great Republic ---- from
within if they can, according to their plan --- for their own
possession."
"The tragic success they have already attained
in their long siege to destroy the moral fiber of American
life is now one of their most potent footholds towards their
own ultimate victory over us."
"Fluoridation of our community water systems
can well become their most subtle weapon for our sure physical
and mental deterioration. As a research chemist of established
standing, I built within the past 22 years 3 American chemical
plants and licensed 6 of my 53 patents. Based on my years of
practical experience in the health food and chemical field,
let me warn: fluoridation of drinking water is criminal
insanity, sure national suicide. DON'T DO IT!!"
"Even in very small quantities, sodium
fluoride is a deadly poison to which no effective antidote has
been found. Every exterminator knows that it is the most
effective rat-killer. Sodium Fluoride is entirely different
from organic calcium-fluoro-phosphate needed by our bodies and
provided by nature, in God's great providence and love, to
build and strengthen our bones and our teeth. This organic
calcium-fluoro-phosphate, derived from proper foods, is an
edible organic salt, insoluble in water and assimilable by the
human body; whereas the non-organic sodium fluoride used in
fluoridating water is instant poison to the body and fully
water soluble. The body refuses to assimilate it."
"Careful, bonafide laboratory experimentation
by conscientious, patriotic research chemists, and actual
medical experience, have both revealed that instead of
preserving or promoting 'dental health', fluoridated drinking
water destroys teeth before adulthood and after, by the
destructive mottling and other pathological conditions it
actually causes in them, and also creates many other very
grave pathological conditions in the internal organisms of
bodies consuming it. How then can it be called a 'health
plan'? What's behind it?"
"That any so-called 'Doctors' would persuade a
civilized nation to add voluntarily a deadly poison to its
drinking water systems is unbelievable. It is the height of
criminal insanity!"
"No wonder Hitler and Stalin fully believed
and agreed from 1939 to 1941 that, quoting from both Lenin's
'Last Will' and Hitler's Mein Kampf: "America we
shall demoralize, divide, and destroy from
within."
"Are our Civil Defense organizations and
agencies awake to the perils of water poisoning by
fluoridation? Its use has been recorded in other countries.
Sodium Fluoride water solutions are the cheapest and most
effective rat killers known to chemists: colorless, odorless,
tasteless; no antidote, no remedy, no hope: Instant and
complete extermination of rats."
"Fluoridation of water systems can be slow
national suicide, or quick national liquidation. It is
criminal insanity ------- treason!!"
Signed: Dr. E.H. Bronner, Research Chemist,
Los Angeles
Apparently, the public outcry by Dr. Bronner
and others precluded the fluoridation of public water systems
for a season - but soon thereafter, the Food and Drug
Administration allowed this deadly poison to be put in
'toothpaste', and our dentists were systematically brainwashed
into providing 'fluoride treatments' to their many patients.
Of course, today many major metropolitan areas have a minimum
of 1 parts per million sodium fluoride systematically added to
their water supply and more areas are seeking to add this
poison every year. Add to this the fact that bottling
companies (soft drinks, juices, etc.) use fluoridated water to
make their products - is it any wonder that people can no
longer think clearly and ask pertinent questions of their
elected and ecclesiastical leaders? Is it also a mystery why
so many top Nazi mind control scientists were brought to
America by the CIA and their infamous 'Operation Paper
Clip'?
If you believe all of this is 'just a
coincidence' - go ahead and keep brushing your teeth with your
'fluoride' toothpaste and sucking on your sodium fluoride
enhanced Coke or Pepsi product - for ignorance truly is bliss
and you truly deserve what you get.
Mothers, if your little ones are having
trouble concentrating at home or in school, or have been
diagnosed as 'attention deficit' - perhaps you would be well
advised to look for the culprit (and the solution to the
problem) no further than your home medicine cabinet (your tube
of toothpaste) and your friendly neighborhood school's water
fountain!!
other related links : The Dentist's Tale --
Fluoride Can Kill - Fluoride & Killer
Chemical Compounds - Story of a Dentist who talks to a
chemist, is threatened with his practice, gets cancer and goes
public. (The Ecologist, September 2000 Vol 30 No 6)
Artificial Fluoridation
Litigation - Highlights in North
American Litigation during the twentieth century on artificial
fluoridation of public water supplies.
[PDF]
Dental Fluorosis, A Case
Study - From the faculty of medicine
and dentistry, University of Western Ontario. Information on
fluoride sources, fluorosis and its health implications.
Fluoride and Fluorosis - Information on fluoride and how to diagnose and
avoid fluorosis from the Fluorosis Research and Rural
Development Foundation of India. Includes scientific
bibliography.
Fluoride News Tracker - Provides news briefs from around the world regarding
the use of fluoridation.
Fluoride-History
- Includes history and patent information on
fluoride-containing products.
http://www.ukcaf.org - UK
Councils Against Fluoridation contains News, information, and
links to fluoridation opposition information
Massachusetts Coalition for Oral Health - The Massachusetts Coalition for Oral Health (MCOH)
is an organization dedicated to improving the oral health of
the residents of Massachusetts through the use of effective,
community-based oral health education and preventive measures.
MCOH seems to be organized to fluoridate Worcester,
Massachusetts
North
Coast Fluoride Information Network -
Pro-fluoridation site states, "The evidence supporting the
safety, efficacy, and cost-effectiveness of fluoridation of
community water supplies comes from multiple sources covering
50 years of legitimate research published in peer reviewed
journals, including both long term studies on large
populations, recent confirmatory studies, and comprehensive
literature reviews."
NSF Fact Sheet for Fluoridation
Chemicals - NSF (National Sanitary
Foundation, International) is the body that regulates U.S.
fluoridation chemicals. NSF has compiled data on the level of
contaminants found in all fluoridation products (Antimony,
arsenic, barium, beryllium, cadmium, chromium, copper, lead,
mercury, radionuclides, selenium). [PDF]
Sodium Hexafluorosilicate and Fluorosilicic Acid:
Review of Toxicological Literature -
Water fluoride chemicals were never safety tested. This
document is nominating silcofluorides, used by over 90% of US
fluoridating communities, for health and safety testing for
the first time. Prepared for Scott Masten, Ph.D. National
Institute of Environmental Health Sciences October 2001 [PDF]
The Story of Water Fluoridation
- Fluoride started out as an unwanted contaminant. Examines
how it was made beneficial, from the U.S. National Institutes
of Health.
Three Historical Case Studies:
Fluoridation - Consumers Union of
United States analysis of how tactical errors in efforts to
encourage Americans to drink fluoridated water.
US Surgeon General's Oral Health Report - Surgeon General explains that tooth decay is still a
major US problem in poor and minority populations and suggests
ways to improve the situation.
Why Fluoridation Is Important -
Subtitle: "Don't Let the Poisonmongers Scare You!" Discusses
many arguments against fluoridation and how those tend to be
invalid or incorrect.
Science and Ethics of Water
Fluoridation - Article published in
the Journal of the Canadian Dental Association questions the
ethics and safety of water fluoridation. [PDF]
(November, 2001)
Fluoride, Hydrogen Fluoride and
Fluorine - U.S. Dept of Health and
Human Services report about toxicity of fluoride included that
to certain subsets of the population. (April,
1993)
ChemGlobe: Fluorine - Electronic, thermal, and steric data along with
basic information.
LANL: Flourine -
History, properties, uses, and handling.
Lenntech: Fluorine - Physical data, chemical properties, health and
environmental effects.
Visual Elements: Fluorine - General and physical information, source, uses, key
isotopes, and ionisation energies.
Wikipedia: Fluorine - Properties of the element, including its history,
applications, and characteristics
Adverse Health and Behavior from
Silicoflourides
During over 50 years of debate on water
flouridation, neither supporters nor critics paid attention to
differences between sodium flouride (NaF) and two chemicals
called silicoflourides - hydroflourosilicic acid
(H2SiF6) and sodium silicoflouride
(Na2SiF6) - as the chemicals for this
purpose. The biochemistry of silicoflourides (SiF), as
revealed by Westendorf's research (for which a translation is
provided in this site), differs greatly from sodium flouride
(familiar in toothpaste and tested for safety). Today over 116
million Americans drink water treated with one of the
silicoflourides even though they are toxic compounds whose
residue after dissociation in water had never been studied for
their safety. This web-site focuses on research I've conducted
with Myron (Mike) Coplan, a retired chemical engineer with
experience in designing equipment for the separation of SiF in
plants producing phosphate fertilizer.
Our collaboration began after Mike heard of my
EPA-funded studies of the association between industrial
pollution with lead or manganese and higher rates of violent
crime and asked if I'd want to investigate the effects of SiF
use in public water supplies. A decade of research together
began with finding that, compared to NaF, water treated with
either SiF is associated with greater absorption of lead from
environmental sources such as lead paint in old housing.
Because lead is a neurotoxin that reduces inhibition and
learning, we compared the effects of NaF and SiF on behavioral
problems due to changes in brain chemistry. Taking
socio-economic and demographic factors into account, the
studies summarized below show that SiF has signficant
association (not found for NaF) with increased rates of
violent crime as well as higher rates of substance abuse and
learning disabilities. Since these behavioral problems cost
American tax-payers billions of dollars, our research can have
substantial practical benefits - and thus illustrates the need
to link some public policy decisions to new developments in
scientific research on human behavior.
Fluoridated water may be
having its most devastating
effectsonthemostvulnerable,thoseinuteroandinfantslessthat
one year old, whose brains are mostsensitive to developmental
neurotoxins such as fluoride.
The Victorian
Government has been extremely cunning in the way they have
performed this roll out, although more than likely it's not an
original idea but is just mirroring what is being done
nationally, and quite probably even,
internationally.
They know that by
introducing fluoridation to one region at a time, most of the
opposition to it will only be coming from that one
region.
43 percent of Medicaid-eligible children
age 1-5 go to the dentist
19 Percent of kindergarteners
have untreated tooth decay
(*did it help tooth decay
here?????????????????)
what about here? : In Canada we are now spending more money
treating dental fluorosis than we do treating
cavities." Dr Harvey Limeback,
President of the Canadian Association for Dental Research,
addressing his Faculty, 1999.
*i could do this
for hours but i think we get the
point
The
cult of water fluoridation is spreading. If the latest
attempts to spread this bogus medication across the UK
succeeds, then an epidemic of chronic fluoride poisoning will
sweep the country, as it has in fluoridated Ireland. Three or
four of the children in every classroom will develop a
disfiguring condition, dental fluorosis, that
obsessive fluoride
proponents casually
dismiss as 'only a slight cosmetic defect'. Their parents will
be forced to meet the repeated costs of cosmetic dentistry. So
disadvantaged families will actually suffer from even greater
'health inequalities' than they do at present. This bogus
'cure' does not actually work - it simply adds another disease
to the burden of the
poor.
:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
The reason we are having so
much trouble stopping this water fluoridation process, is
because the decision to introduce it did not come from local,
state or Federal Government, it came from sources
that are behind the scenes.... exploring this website
will answer most of your questions as to who
the culprits are.......
*THANKYOU ANGELO FOR SENDING THIS
NEWSPAPER ARTICLE AND FOR SPEAKING UP FOR THE GEELONG
PEOPLE, NOT ONLY WILL THIS HELP YOU, YOUR SON THAT IS MY
NEPHEW, BUT ALL THE PEOPLE PENDING MASS MEDICATION BY A
CARELESS, UNWILLING AND UNDEREDUCATED GOVERNMENT THAT
WANTS TO FORCE ITS WILL UPON THIS NATION THAT IT HAS BOUGHT IT
TO ITS KNEES.
"In summary, we hold that
fluoridation is an unreasonable risk." - US
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY HEADQUARTERS' UNION,
2001.
"Over the past ten
years a large body of peer-reviewed science
has raised concerns that fluoride may
present unreasonable health risks, particularly among
children, at levels routinely added to tap water in American
cities." - ENVIRONMENTAL
WORKING GROUP, July 2005
"I am quite
convinced that water fluoridation, in a not-too-distant
future, will be consigned to medical history." -
Dr. ARVID CARLSSON, Winner, Nobel Prize for Medicine
(2000).
National Kidney Foundation
in USA withdraw support on Fluoridation.
Authorities in the US have also been warned not to
destroy the evidence that may be needed by people for
taking legal action from harm caused by drinking fluoridated
water.
The National Kidney Foundation has finally admitted
that people can be harmed by drinking Fluoridated water and
people with kidney problems, infants, diabetics, wildlife
and pets are at higher risk.
In the case of kidney disease where dialysis machines
are needed, Fluoridated water cannot be used as it is KNOWN to be dangerous to
patients.
( means they have known all along
how bad fluoride is for you and still the intention is to harm
people, every glass of fluoridated water you have is another
potential attempt on harming your body and they want
us to pay for the opportunity of harming yourself
on top of it, not to mention doctor and hospital fees as
well.)
The International
Fluoridation Conference just held this month in Toronto
released information from 18 Scientific
studies.
The reports show damming evidence of health
DAMAGE from FLUORIDE, especially among young people, yet BARWON HEALTH
and the STATE GOVT told us in
February that consuming Fluoride through water was completely
safe, a BARWON HEALTH uneducated spokesman denied claims that Fluoride
could harm brain development and cause lower IQ. Unfortunately
the EVIDENCE says
otherwise.
Studies in Toronto showed the
same results for fluoridating water that have always been
there ie.children in towns with Fluoride have significantly
lower average IQ's than children who live in towns that use
low level Fluoride water.
Sweden rejected Fluoridation years ago because a
Swedish Noble Prize winner warned that there was evidence that
Fluoride harmed infants'
nerve and brain
cells.
These people
pushing the Fluoridation issue should be taken to
court and prosecuted for misdirecting the public among many
other things and at the very least immediately relieved of
their jobs that they do not know how to carry out,
that we waste our money on.
:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
MEDIA
RELEASE:11th
November 2008
Councillor
and candidates will speak at
CHOICE
on FLUORIDATION RALLY
11am,
12th November, at Barwon Water Ryrie
St
Sitting councillor, former Geelong
Mayor Barbara Abley
has confirmed she will speak to the assembled people and media
in front of Barwon Water, on why the fluoride decision
was wrongand should be withdrawn
until there is a vote.
At least two other candidates in the
November council elections will speak, possibly more. Several
others have sent their messages.
See www.BAFF.org.au for a listing of those who are making
election promises of action to give the water consumers a
choice on fluoridation.
The crowd that comes may be small or
maybe medium sized. It is a working day and the vast majority
of concerned citizens are at work or busy with family duties,
and those there will each represent dozens of
others.
They will be there, handing over
thousands of letters for others, to add to the thousands of
earlier in the year, because:
(1) The people who are harmed by
fluoride are not going away, and they are being offered no
alternative supply ofclean water. They want to know: isBarwon
Water listening, will they listen, will government
listen?
(2) Themany who do NOT CONSENT to
being treated with a medical chemical through their water
supply are not going away.They want to know: isBarwon
Water listening, will they listen, will government
listen?
(3) Fluoride (fluorosilicic acid or
FSA)is a poison, a Schedule 7 poison on the Australian Poisons
Schedule. There is no safe dose for a poison of this
type, especiallygiven that neither Barwon Water nor government
can monitor who is consuming large amounts or who is consuming
small amounts.
Further, the material data sheets from
Incitec Pivot, the supplier, show that
their fluoride material is contaminated with
arsenic, mercury and lead.
They make no apology for it. It would be too
expensive to clean it up. Incitec Pivot is
laughing allthe way to the bank as
government allows them to dispose their contaminated
industry waste in our drinking water supply,
via Barwon
Water.
